FDA RECORDS COMPARED

Shark CryoGlow vs Omnilux Contour vs CurrentBody Series 2

Three premium masks, three FDA 510(k) records. Here is what each filing says the device is cleared for, and which wavelengths it lists.

L

LED Mask Lab Editorial Team

Independent editorial team. No paid placements, no brand sponsorships.

Updated: Oct 5, 2026

⚠️ Affiliate Disclosure: This page contains Amazon affiliate links, marked (paid link). As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Buying through them costs you nothing extra.
Shark CryoGlow FW312PL LED face mask with under-eye cooling

Shark CryoGlow

Check Price →
Omnilux Contour Face flexible silicone LED mask with red and near-infrared light

Omnilux Contour Face

Check Price →
CurrentBody Series 2 flexible silicone LED light therapy mask

CurrentBody Series 2

Check Price →

What each FDA record says

From the recordShark CryoGlowOmnilux Contour FaceCurrentBody Series 2
510(k) numberK242796 (Nov 27, 2024)K191629 (Sep 12, 2019)K250966 (Jun 25, 2025)
Device name on the 510(k)CryoGlow (FW3XXXX)faceLITECurrentBody Skin LED Light Therapy Mask Series 2 (MK-90H)
Indications for useFine lines and wrinkles; mild-to-moderate inflammatory acneFull-face wrinklesFull-face wrinkles
Wavelengths in the filingRed 630, blue 415, infrared 830 nm (±10)Red 630, near-infrared 830 nm (±10)Red 633, near-infrared 830 nm
LEDs in the filing480 (160 tri-wick packages)Not in the filing text we read220 (110 at 633 nm, 110 at 830 nm)
Mask body in the filingMolded plasticFlexible siliconeFlexible silicone
Treatment in the filingVaries by mode10 minutes, 5 times a week for 6 weeks10 minutes, 5 times a week for 6 weeks

Read in the 510(k) filing PDFs at accessdata.fda.gov on 5 October 2026. Search the same numbers yourself in the 510(k) database; how we match records to the masks sold today is on our clearance check page.

Three things the records show

Only the CryoGlow is cleared for acne. Its indication covers fine lines and wrinkles with red and infrared light, and mild-to-moderate inflammatory acne with red, blue and infrared. The filing puts the blue LED at 415 nm. The Omnilux and CurrentBody filings are for full-face wrinkles only, and neither lists a blue wavelength.

The Omnilux record carries a different name. The GUDID entry for the Contour Face cites K191629, a clearance issued in 2019 for a device named faceLITE, applicant Ismart Marketing Svcs, Ltd. The other two masks are on record under their own names (Shark's with a model pattern, FW3XXXX, that covers the FW312PL sold on Amazon).

CurrentBody's own spec goes beyond its filing. CurrentBody lists 236 LEDs, including 16 at 1072 nm. The 510(k) filing for model MK-90H lists 220 LEDs at 633 and 830 nm and no 1072 nm wavelength. Both statements are in our catalog with their sources; we have not found a record that covers the 1072 nm LEDs.

Which one fits

If breakouts are part of why you want a mask, the CryoGlow is the one of the three whose clearance covers acne. It also adds under-eye cooling, which its filing describes as refreshing the skin rather than as a treatment. If wrinkles are the only goal and you want a flexible silicone mask, the Omnilux and CurrentBody filings describe that design and the same 10-minute, five-times-a-week protocol. Our Omnilux and CurrentBody reviews and the CurrentBody vs Omnilux comparison go into those two in more detail.

We compare published specifications and public FDA records; no hands-on testing of these devices took place.