Both are premium. Both use red + near-infrared. So what actually separates them on paper?
Cleared under its own name. Extended jaw coverage, per the maker.
Check Price → (paid link)
Flexible silicone. Wireless. Travel-friendly.
Check Price → (paid link)Choose CurrentBody if full jaw and chin coverage matter and you want the FDA record under the product's own name. Its filing lists the same red and near-infrared pair as Omnilux; the 1072nm wavelength CurrentBody advertises is not in it.
Choose Omnilux if you value comfort, portability, and not being tethered during sessions - its manufacturer cites published photobiomodulation research behind the wavelength pair.
| Feature | CurrentBody Series 2 | Omnilux Contour |
|---|---|---|
| OBJECTIVE SPECS | ||
| Wavelengths in the FDA filing | 633 / 830nm | 630 / 830nm (faceLITE filing) |
| Wavelengths the maker lists | 633 / 830 / 1072nm | 633 / 830nm |
| LED Count | 220 in the FDA filing (maker lists 236) | 132 |
| Wireless (no cord) | No | Yes |
| Warranty | 2 years | 2 years |
| SOURCE-QUALIFIED - NOT INDEPENDENTLY CONFIRMED BY US | ||
| Jaw/Chin Coverage | Full | Partial |
| Session time | 10 min | Not published by manufacturer |
| EDITORIAL IMPRESSION - NOT A MEASURED SPECIFICATION | ||
| Comfort / Fit | Flexible silicone | Flexible silicone |
| Travel-friendly | Moderate | Excellent |
On paper the two filings are close: both describe red and near-infrared light, around 630 and 830nm, in a flexible silicone mask, for 10 minutes a session. What separates them is form and paperwork. The CurrentBody Series 2 is cleared under its own name and the maker lists extended jaw and chin coverage; its advertised 1072nm wavelength is not in the filing. The Omnilux Contour Face is wireless during use, and its record sits under the earlier faceLITE name. If you travel or have struggled to stay consistent with a mask tethered to a cable, that may matter more than anything in the table.