Both are premium. Both use red + near-infrared. So what actually separates them on paper?
Triple wavelength. Extended jaw coverage. Deeper penetration.
Check Price โ(paid link)
Flexible silicone. Wireless. Travel-friendly.
Check Price โ(paid link)Choose CurrentBody if deep tissue penetration and full jaw/chin coverage are your priorities โ the 1072nm wavelength is genuinely unique among consumer masks.
Choose Omnilux if you value comfort, portability, and not being tethered during sessions โ its manufacturer cites published photobiomodulation research behind the wavelength pair.
| Feature | CurrentBody Series 2 | Omnilux Contour |
|---|---|---|
| Wavelengths | 633 / 830 / 1072nm | 633 / 830nm |
| LED Count | 236 | 132 |
| Jaw/Chin Coverage | Full | Partial |
| Comfort / Fit | Flexible silicone | Medical silicone |
| Wireless (no cord) | No | Yes |
| Travel-friendly | Moderate | Excellent |
| Warranty | 2 years | 1 year |
| Session time | 10 min | 10 min |
If we had to recommend one for the broadest range of people targeting anti-aging, it's the CurrentBody Series 2 โ per manufacturer specifications, its 1072nm wavelength penetrates deeper than the 633/830nm pair alone, and it adds jaw and chin coverage the Omnilux doesn't have. But if you travel often or have struggled to stay consistent with masks that tether you to a wall, the comfort and wireless freedom of the Omnilux Contour Face may matter more than raw specs. The best mask is the one you'll actually use.